🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.